Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Acer Predator PO3-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO3-600(DCH)
Memory	19 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200408
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '23 at 11:13
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$250 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Memory 87.5 1-Core 136 2-Core 270 91% 165 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 912 87% 719 Pts	64-Core 913 56% 913 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385 21,427 User benchmarks, average bench 145% Asus(1043 88F8) CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	145% Outstanding	Lighting 202 Reflection 177 Parallax 188 164% 189 fps	MRender 266 Gravity 158 Splatting 114 139% 180 fps
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 157%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB 18,999 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,069 Write 1,155 Mixed 1,178 254% 1,134 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 59.3 200% 72.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,032 DQ Write 856 DQ Mixed 963 716% 950 MB/s
Poor: 110% Great: 213%
Micron CT2000X 2TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 123GB free Firmware: PMAP SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 341 377 399 397 400 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 311 Write 334 Mixed 317 SusWrite 354 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 26.5 93% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 149 115% 155 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.1% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 21.3 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 21.6 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	165	27"	1280 720	ACR074A XB273U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	902x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	702x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	581x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	489x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	440x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	393x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	515x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	324x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	167x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	498x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	314x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	197x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $539

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16