Gigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H370M D3H GSM
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 08:57
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 492
63% 475 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 268
Parallax 288
240% 284 fps
MRender 369
Gravity 245
Splatting 191
210% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 204%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$55
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 521 388 367 348 339 325 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,095
Write 1,065
Mixed 976
SusWrite 382
197% 879 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 46.1
159% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 855
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 793
600% 805 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 152%
Great: 238%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
398GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1015 1112 1175 651 1005 635 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,300
Write 1,234
Mixed 974
SusWrite 932
250% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 54.2
180% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 797
DQ Mixed 348
381% 636 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 200%
Great: 277%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
215GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 327 191 187 172 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 397
Write 386
Mixed 333
SusWrite 242
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 42
138% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
553GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 90 91 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50% Above average
Read 84.4
Write 85.5
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 89.6
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50%
Great: 59%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
535GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 110 111 109 112 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45% Average
Read 48.3
Write 88.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 109
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 28.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ7F76 BenQ EX2780Q
Typical GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback