Daewoo Solo Top

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Daewoo Solo Top
Motherboard	Daewoo Solo Top (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101104
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '23 at 05:29
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89 20,692 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 179 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 305 37% 285 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.9% Average	Lighting 61.2 Reflection 72.1 Parallax 63.3 50% 65.5 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 62.7 Splatting 56.8 50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-00000 128GB 280 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT0200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 153 149 151 154 149 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 209 Write 194 Mixed 202 SusWrite 150 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 30.5 98% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 38.5 DQ Write 88.7 DQ Mixed 40.7 38% 56 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 115%
Whalekom 256GB 256GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 97GB free Firmware: V1031C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 95 5.1 25 86 6.1 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.9% Very poor	Read 213 Write 91 Mixed 10 SusWrite 38.9 19% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.3 30% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 161%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown whalekom 16GB 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.2% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	21.5"	1920 1017	TGL4510 TGL TW4510

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Solo Top Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Daewoo Solo Top

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	15x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	8x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	7x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	12x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	10x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	9x

SSD
S800 256GBRamstaBench 62%, 813 samples	3x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	3x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	3x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	5x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16