Lenovo 81Y4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81Y4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 03:50
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 128
54% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 433
41% 342 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FA3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.5% Below average
Lighting 47
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 40.4
38% 51.2 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 46.5
42% 51.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0013P6LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 826 841 988 280 245 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,463
Write 1,038
Mixed 915
SusWrite 578
223% 999 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 36.6
131% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 158
148% 241 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 147%
Great: 238%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 21.4
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 120 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD1ED
Typical 81Y4 Builds (Compare 6,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81Y4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback