HP ProBook 650 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 650 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2101
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 17:56
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 78
2-Core 154
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 283
36% 275 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 140 122 124 107 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 394
Write 378
Mixed 373
SusWrite 168
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 25.4
80% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 359
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 130%
WDC WD10JPVX-22J 1TB
80GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 26 25 25 24 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 52.5
Write 35.4
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 27
44% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-4GSL 0112 78.C2GCZ.AU30C 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.3
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 7 25 3 60 0" 1280 720
Typical ProBook 650 G1 Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback