Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 01:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 72.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 320
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 935
95% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,252
78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 28
14% 20.3 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 20.9
15% 18 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HYV256X3(HXY) 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1864 298 369 150 125 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,120
Write 1,791
Mixed 1,269
SusWrite 486
264% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 61.1
202% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 905
676% 902 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 177%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F94 U32R59x
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback