Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 23:39
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 182
2-Core 353
107% 204 Pts
4-Core 695
8-Core 1,338
121% 1,016 Pts
64-Core 2,212
137% 2,212 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Legend(17AA C977) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 175
Parallax 167
149% 175 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 136
Splatting 116
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-500GM 500GB
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 1005 1023 1027 1024 1020 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,750
Write 2,494
Mixed 1,843
SusWrite 998
452% 2,021 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 74.5
242% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,205
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 1,032
777% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 293%
Great: 384%
Samsung MZ7GE960HMHP-00005 960GB
243GB free
Firmware: EXT1303Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 414 418 417 419 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 406
Mixed 274
SusWrite 416
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 35.6
126% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 212
160% 214 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 250GB-$76
225GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 203 198 196 198 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 487
Write 444
Mixed 342
SusWrite 222
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 40.3
137% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 205
156% 211 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 100%
WD WD50EZRZ-32RWYB1 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 165 166 163 166 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 122
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 163
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 94%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 127 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 108
SusWrite 128
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2D3000C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2D3000C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 59.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 29.1
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 28.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3432 HP 24w
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback