Asrock H81M-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-ITX (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140901
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '23 at 17:07
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$59 48,178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 71.5 1-Core 91.3 2-Core 157 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 237 31% 231 Pts	64-Core 237 15% 237 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310 4,920 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 094E) 512MB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 392.50 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.23% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.23% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$71 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 430 414 407 337 348 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 470 Mixed 444 SusWrite 397 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 49.7 162% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 349 261% 347 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 130%
Seagate Basic 4TB 793 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 600GB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 93 89 89 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 59.6 Write 73.6 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 91.3 55% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.5 153% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.9% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 92 44% 92 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	36	60	27.2"	1280 720	HWP3106 HP E271i

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-ITX Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-ITX - $100

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	28x
Core i5-4690Intel $51Bench 67%, 73,695 samples	18x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	42x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	27x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	17x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
SU760 1TBAdataBench 93%, 966 samples	9x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	10x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $409

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16