Monster TULPAR T7 V20.6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.6  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.6
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 16:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 58
1-Core 178
2-Core 319
96% 185 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 785
81% 654 Pts
64-Core 1,330
82% 1,330 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1295) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 62.8
42% 60.2 fps
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 64.4
58% 65.1 fps
Poor: 83% Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1440 1758 1850 1770 999 975 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 981
Write 644
Mixed 1,262
SusWrite 1,466
246% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 61.9
193% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 690
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 527
371% 481 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 210%
Great: 441%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1436 1761 1857 1823 1039 1033 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,136
Write 1,174
Mixed 1,238
SusWrite 1,492
285% 1,260 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 56.8
209% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 38.4
157% 368 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 224%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43CB2-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 30.8
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 18.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 144 17.2" 1920 1080 CMN175C
Typical TULPAR T7 V20.6 Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback