Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W520  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 08:15
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 96
2-Core 191
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 436
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V4900-$150
AMD(1002 2B06) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.1
7% 8.17 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 264 252 254 247 240 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 463
Mixed 367
SusWrite 272
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 43
144% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 365
271% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
338GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 342 335 348 353 353 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 320
Write 348
Mixed 320
SusWrite 345
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 23.9
77% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 161
116% 150 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 96%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
408GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
38% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 74.9
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 68.1
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 AUS278A ASUS PB278QV
Typical CELSIUS W520 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback