Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31235 223 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 181 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 415 45% 357 Pts	64-Core 437 27% 437 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P3000 729 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2884 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	2.26% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 3.81 Parallax 1.69 2% 2.65 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.57 3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.26% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 328GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 403 403 378 365 342 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 389 Mixed 371 SusWrite 378 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 38.9 123% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 342 259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A-PB 4x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.7% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.4 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	9x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	7x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	6x

RAM
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 46%, 5,138 samples	4x
NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 39 samples	4x
M391B5273DH0-YK0 Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 M391B5273DH0-YK0 Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 16GBSamsungBench 48%, 7 samples	3x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $540