Chuwi GemiBook XPro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemChuwi GemiBook XPro  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230602
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 06:51
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 182
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 304
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 5
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 256 229 241 243 243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 452
Write 415
Mixed 369
SusWrite 245
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 26.5
85% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 325
248% 335 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 29.2
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 20.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 0 14" 1280 720 BOE0B09
Typical GemiBook XPro Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi GemiBook XPro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback