Lenovo 30GS003HUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive381% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemLenovo 30GS003HUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1064
Memory46.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 00:19
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900-$451
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 70.8
1-Core 166
2-Core 332
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 668
8-Core 1,269
115% 968 Pts
64-Core 3,397
210% 3,397 Pts
Poor: 119%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB
Legend(17AA 1611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.99
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Lighting 89
Reflection 99.1
Parallax 90.7
72% 92.9 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 80
71% 88.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HDLU-00BLL 1TB
754GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L2QGXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3003 3049 3049 2478 1583 1579 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,736
Write 3,030
Mixed 2,636
SusWrite 2,457
613% 2,715 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 81.6
257% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 833
DQ Mixed 919
686% 912 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 381%
Great: 436%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
183GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 903 907 906 906 909 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,980
Write 923
Mixed 751
SusWrite 906
252% 1,140 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 52.8
189% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 395
357% 561 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 221%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
210GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 482 482 482 483 483 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 478
Mixed 419
SusWrite 482
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 48.2
159% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
895GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2119 2149 2146 2144 2148 1578 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 1706
Write 2,147
Mixed 1,841
SusWrite 2,047
438% 1,935 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 64.3
224% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 789
DQ Mixed 880
656% 872 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 301%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88AGBUA084N 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
150% Outstanding
MC Read 59.7
MC Write 60.5
MC Mixed 57.6
169% 59.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 150%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0B80 U28D590
Typical 30GS003HUS Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

System: Lenovo 30GS003HUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback