Intel X99-P4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-P4  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 15:55
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 14-Core TU
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 130
54% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 547
47% 404 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 200
Parallax 185
93% 166 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 128
Splatting 94.5
90% 112 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 244 14 114 230 239 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 458
Write 392
Mixed 342
SusWrite 203
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 9.7
80% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 13.5
69% 152 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 VTK2700 GFT27DB
Typical X99-P4 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-P4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback