Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 16 '16 at 08:01
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 123
55% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 314
32% 260 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
XFX(1682 3233) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 16
Parallax 21.7
13% 17.7 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 18
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 507
Write 155
Mixed 243
66% 302 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 10.3
42% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 11.6
46% 104 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 94%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59
246GB free
Firmware: GM3O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 76.2
Write 75.4
Mixed 77
58% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.36
87% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
13GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 10.8
Mixed 12.3
17% 15 MB/s
4K Read 5.74
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
22% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64C0MHHHJ-HS Corsair CMX4GX3M1A133 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback