HP 500-303nc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP 500-303nc  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory11 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150310
Uptime6 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 12:23
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 115
43% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 162
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 10.2
10% 12.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.3
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SDSA6GM-016G-1006 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: U221006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 50 50 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 252
Write 47.1
Mixed 54
SusWrite 48.9
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 9.5
42% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 11.7
DQ Mixed 10.4
10% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 28%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 173 126 194 192 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 194
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 169
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 MLLSE 1600 8GB Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 18GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 17 183 59 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F1C BenQ RL2455
Typical 500-303nc Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-303nc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $96
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback