HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 10:38
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 139
58% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 222
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 240
Dell(1028 210B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 8.7
4% 6.8 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 4.3
4% 5.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07985
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 321
Write 89.5
Mixed 127
SusWrite 90.7
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 20.7
96% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 88.5
DQ Mixed 87.7
70% 100 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
423GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 123 123 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 117
Write 125
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 123
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
WD My Passport 2626 1TB
423GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 102 106 105 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 77.5
Write 89
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 102
114% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 87 59 60 24.1" 1920 1137 HWP2955 HP ZR2440w
Typical ProDesk 400 G2 MT Builds (Compare 573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback