Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics298% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory109.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 04:16
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$492
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 72.7
1-Core 202
2-Core 405
116% 227 Pts
4-Core 800
8-Core 1,564
140% 1,182 Pts
64-Core 3,559
220% 3,559 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$958
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Lighting 447
Reflection 430
Parallax 462
365% 446 fps
MRender 559
Gravity 372
Splatting 268
312% 400 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 298%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$273
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,938
Write 5,951
Mixed 3,400
1,133% 5,096 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 84.2
269% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,520
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 1,303
920% 1,185 MB/s
Poor: 475% Great: 926%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$299
2TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,802
Write 3,686
Mixed 3,128
720% 3,205 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 78.4
251% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,506
DQ Write 1,134
DQ Mixed 1,334
994% 1,325 MB/s
Poor: 306% Great: 619%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX CMP64GX5M2B6000C30 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
183% Outstanding
MC Read 115
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 54.4
202% 70.5 GB/s
SC Read 44.1
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 42.6
125% 43.8 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 183%
Great: 183%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 240 48.7" 1280 720 SAM7053 LC49G95T
Typical GA-X670E AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 402%
Desktop 115%
Workstation 528%

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback