MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 01:26
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 215
70% 129 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 709
68% 560 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 3870) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 51.4
Parallax 47.1
43% 50.3 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 40.8
38% 47.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,602
Write 2,028
Mixed 1,477
451% 2,035 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 74.5
248% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 809
DQ Mixed 476
460% 726 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 383%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
62GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 99 66 78 94 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 119
Write 20.7
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 80.5
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.3
130% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 90%
Wl3000gsa6454 0 3TB
128GB free
Firmware: MKAONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 130 129 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 137
Write 150
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 130
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 86%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
35GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 116 115 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 144
Write 140
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 119
136% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
40GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 96 90 90 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 84
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 96.6
114% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
208% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M1Z3600C18 F4-3200C16-8GIS F4-3200C16-8GIS 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.3% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 25.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7016 SAMSUNG
Typical B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 8,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback