HP ZBook Studio 16 inch G10 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook Studio 16 inch G10 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B8F
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 20:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 199
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 536
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8B8F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 14.9
10% 14.3 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 12.2
13% 16 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-1T00-1006 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 567 616 557 834 1063 1117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,131
Write 911
Mixed 928
SusWrite 792
211% 940 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 43.4
159% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 122
147% 264 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 157%
Great: 503%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
133% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 54.1
153% 53.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 133%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 33 120 16" 1280 720 AUO87A8
Typical ZBook Studio 16 inch G10 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: HP ZBook Studio 16 inch G10 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback