Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 14:23
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 1,122
101% 852 Pts
64-Core 2,194
136% 2,194 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
203% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 271
Parallax 290
238% 284 fps
MRender 369
Gravity 246
Splatting 193
212% 270 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 203%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STES1020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 947 922 401 92 449 497 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 1,886
Mixed 1,686
SusWrite 551
264% 1,149 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 61.3
220% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,476
DQ Write 1,102
DQ Mixed 986
819% 1,188 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 177%
Great: 371%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
106GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 307 302 305 309 311 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 439
Mixed 389
SusWrite 313
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 56.2
187% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 213
160% 214 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Intel SSDSC2KG038T8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: XCV10110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 383 380 382 382 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 321
Write 341
Mixed 332
SusWrite 380
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 31
111% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 192
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79%
Great: 96%
Intel SSDSC2KG038T8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: XCV10110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 383 382 382 382 381 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 330
Write 346
Mixed 324
SusWrite 380
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 33.2
116% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 193
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 179 176 181 180 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 174
Mixed 107
SusWrite 178
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
614GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 163 158 163 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 146
Write 149
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 161
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
82% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 34.6
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 32.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G3
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback