Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK E1504FA
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '23 at 10:38
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	49.7% Average	Memory 33.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 200 58% 114 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 532 55% 444 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 2,063 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 282D) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 11.1 2% 8.07 fps	MRender 9.2 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 6 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB 19,397 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 425GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 473 456 515 510 522 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 579 Write 513 Mixed 483 SusWrite 492 116% 517 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 41.9 129% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 444 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 388 267% 336 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 290%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 2x4GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.7% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 18.4 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 11.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	41	15	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

CPU
Ryzen 5 7520U GraphicsAMDBench 53%, 1,439 samples	51x
Ryzen 3 7320U GraphicsAMDBench 52%, 1,118 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 2,063 samples	65x

SSD
SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBIntelBench 185%, 19,397 samples	45x
MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 2,451 samples	9x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA256TFK 256GBBench 158%, 336 samples	4x

RAM
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 2x4GBMicronBench 68%, 162 samples	22x
H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 2x4GBHynixBench 66%, 154 samples	18x
H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 120 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16