Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130313
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 05:29
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 121
56% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 188
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 67.8
56% 69.6 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 67
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STKSF012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 134 149 149 155 156 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 258
Write 204
Mixed 214
SusWrite 158
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 21.2
82% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 172
122% 153 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 86%
GS512 512GB
46GB free
Firmware: U0104A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 328 330 345 358 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 422
Write 330
Mixed 336
SusWrite 294
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 21.9
93% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 49.7
83% 159 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
231GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 116 117 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 116
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 109%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
254GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 88 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 62.3
Write 84.8
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 86.1
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
349GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 71.2
Write 71.4
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 76.7
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-560.A Corsair CMV4GX3M1A133 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1 Corsair CMV4GX3M1A133 14GB
1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.5
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 72.3" 1280 720 SNYEE01 SONY TV
Typical GA-F2A85X-UP4 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback