Biostar A960D+V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+V2  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 04:47
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 82.3
43% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 67.9
14% 94.7 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.8% Average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 64.3
50% 65.9 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 63
Splatting 0.2
31% 43.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 25 27 19 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 52.2
Write 11.4
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 18.7
18% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99P5474-013.AOOLF 99P5474-013.AOOLF 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 4 60 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 Q34G2G5
Typical A960D+V2 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback