Lenovo 82R9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82R9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 01:06
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 129
52% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 434
42% 347 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3806) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 19.2
4% 11.8 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 14.8
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MGE1QDY 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4L0630
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 933 939 880 538 574 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 701
Write 705
Mixed 651
SusWrite 793
161% 712 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 25.4
92% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 592
421% 547 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 263%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AB-MGCL 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 20.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 14" 1280 720 LEN9125
Typical 82R9 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82R9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback