Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 40.6 2-Core 75.3 43% 64.2 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 400 33% 287 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E127) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 136 133 134 129 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 455 Write 433 Mixed 351 SusWrite 166 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 27.9 107% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 363 261% 336 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 4x4GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	53	60	21.5"	1280 720	AOC2260 2260W

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16