Besstar TH50

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemBesstar TH50  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR Default string
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 12:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-11320H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 283
82% 157 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 618
69% 540 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E50 800D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 27.9
20% 26.6 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 1
9% 12.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 313 322 366 289 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,340
Write 1,136
Mixed 1,111
SusWrite 318
218% 976 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 274
4K Mixed 87.6
345% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 818
666% 934 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 222%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HKNNNFBMAVAR-NEH 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 36
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 16.4
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 0 60 21.5" 1280 720 IVM5620 PL2280H
Typical TH50 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Besstar TH50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback