Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 10:58
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 256
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 788
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,011
63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 125
Parallax 115
88% 116 fps
MRender 92.9
Gravity 121
Splatting 110
89% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 108
Mixed 118
48% 223 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 15.8
72% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 24.7
DQ Mixed 1.2
19% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$33
134GB free
Firmware: UF300000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 228
Mixed 143
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 19.1
82% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 61.2
DQ Mixed 41.3
44% 73.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
209GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 504
Write 451
Mixed 442
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 55.5
185% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 270
226% 328 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
614GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 156
Mixed 69.7
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
20GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3.7
Write 5.7
Mixed 9.5
9% 6.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FH 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 180 24" 1920 1080 AUS24B1 ROG PG248Q
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $696
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback