MSI H61M-P31 (G3) (MS-7788)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7788
MotherboardMSI H61M-P31 (G3) (MS-7788)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 06:36
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 194
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 460
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2110 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.4% Good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 85
Parallax 75.9
72% 83.2 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 69.4
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 203 8.8 11 11 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.7% Above average
Read 254
Write 240
Mixed 232
SusWrite 61.8
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 24.7
109% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 34.5
65% 129 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24.5" 1920 1080 AOC2590 2590G5
Typical H61M-P31 (G3) (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P31 (G3) (MS-7788) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback