Asus A88X-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88X-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 17:11
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 87.4
41% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 131
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 38.4
33% 39.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 27.7
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 5.3 2.2 22 3.8 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 422
Write 289
Mixed 277
SusWrite 44.5
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 14.1
57% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 79.9
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 40.3
31% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 55%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
108GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 282 292 288 288 264 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 427
Write 249
Mixed 89
SusWrite 278
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 12.1
46% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 20
16% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Nanya M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1920 1017 PKB0386 Viseo243D
Typical A88X-PLUS Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PLUS - $114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback