Lenovo 4157CTO

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Lenovo 4157CTO (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	21 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140115
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '18 at 06:26
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5690 4,873 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 173 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 502 49% 400 Pts	64-Core 639 40% 639 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.61 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.46% Terrible	Lighting 7.53 Reflection 8.88 Parallax 7.16 6% 7.86 fps	MRender 9.76 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 8.48 7% 8.68 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 398 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 27 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 59 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 686275629	72.4% Very good	Read 259 Write 213 Mixed 216 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 39 132% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 100 97% 153 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 426GB free Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 86 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 100 97 (03) Spinup time 126 100 12895912131 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2052 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 100 31 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 27016 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1994 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 92 92 589823 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 131072 (BC) Unknown 100 95 34364326144 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 53 472252451 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2060 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2060 (C2) HDA temperature 171 130 201864708131 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.4% Good	Read 120 Write 104 Mixed 103 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.41 97% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 76%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35 3,015 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 176GB free Firmware: 04.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 154 152 1275 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 101 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 83 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 49 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 26 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 74 (C2) HDA temperature 111 106 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 81 (F1) Unknown 200 200 4612981653 (F2) Unknown 200 200 293153697	93% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 164 Mixed 151 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 1.58 4K Write 3.96 4K Mixed 0.39 183% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 14.6 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 11.2 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4157CTO Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4157CTO

CPU
Xeon W3530Intel $290Bench 65%, 5,773 samples	3x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	2x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	2x
HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples	1x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	1x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x
KingFast 256GBBench 72%, 7,147 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $332

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16