Asrock H110M-HDS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160125
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 10:58
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 170
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 250
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gainward(10B0 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 22.9
18% 21.8 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 18.6
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 29 73 35 37 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.7% Poor
Read 172
Write 90.9
Mixed 81
SusWrite 74
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 8.6
35% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
345GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 134 133 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 156
Write 150
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 133
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
82GB free
Firmware: 3.CHL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 68
Write 71.6
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 52.7
42% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905665-006.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 3 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback