Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 23:59
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 145
2-Core 287
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 950
93% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,472
91% 1,472 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 193
Parallax 187
150% 188 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 191
Splatting 127
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 242 195 126 151 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,008
Write 714
Mixed 294
SusWrite 192
122% 552 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 52.3
180% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 427
364% 536 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 134%
Great: 155%
Adata SU630 240GB
168GB free
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 38 6.6 22 47 6.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 509
Write 390
Mixed 345
SusWrite 51.1
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 68.7
DQ Write 6.1
DQ Mixed 0.4
10% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 101%
Team TM8FPD512G 512GB
423GB free
Firmware: EDFM20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1671 661 434 419 393 384 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1206
Write 1,665
Mixed 1310
SusWrite 660
273% 1,210 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 70.2
238% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,227
DQ Write 840
DQ Mixed 1,033
771% 1,033 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 209%
Great: 307%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
68GB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 63 71 68 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 93.5
Write 93.2
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 62.4
63% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 61%
WL1000GSA3272 1TB
285GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 104 63 14 0.8 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 49.7
Write 41.7
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 54.8
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
24% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 24.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 27.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 36.1" 1280 720 ELE77C0 E4SW5017RKU
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,704 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $365

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,275
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback