HP ZBook 17 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 17 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80D6
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime16 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 21:08
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 156
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 425
45% 361 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80D6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9416
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 6.4
4% 6.17 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000H1 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 260 201 173 172 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 400
Write 376
Mixed 340
SusWrite 223
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 30.1
95% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 321
242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
110GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 389 388 374 394 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 426
Write 395
Mixed 348
SusWrite 380
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 30.7
101% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 333
249% 332 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
136GB free
Firmware: GS2OA340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 52.3
Write 68
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 74
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 72%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.5
Mixed 9
13% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
36% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 14%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3.7
Mixed 11.2
10% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
10% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.3% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 21.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 25 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1738
Typical ZBook 17 G3 Builds (Compare 1,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback