Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 18:22
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 286
86% 165 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 852
75% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 153A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.8% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 52.2
Parallax 49.1
46% 52.5 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 41.6
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 45%
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1539) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 10
Parallax 5.6
4% 6.8 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 7
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,392
Write 2,389
Mixed 1,708
482% 2163 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 98
329% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,075
DQ Write 840
DQ Mixed 920
699% 945 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4S2S1ME-8 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 14.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 0R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 29% 17 218 60 0 52" 1536 801 HEC0030 HISENSE
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback