PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z420 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1589 |
Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180710 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 16 '23 at 17:07 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | BGR-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
65.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 969 MHz, MLim: 1243 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.Q1.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team T2535T240G 240GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1025A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 165 49 47 46 37 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 108 113 111 109 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 49 | 18 | 60 | 22" | 1680 1050 | LEN1146 L2240pwD |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,508x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 785x |
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 695x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 497x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 307x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 261x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |