Dell OptiPlex 5060

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 5060
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 5060  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 14:26
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 210
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 582
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Dell(1028 085B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 7.1
4% 6.93 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.1
4% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 304 303 305 299 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 436
Write 311
Mixed 268
SusWrite 301
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 28.4
101% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 225
189% 276 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K36FTX-MIR 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 5.6
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 39 60 18.5" 1280 720 HWP3012 HP W1972a
Typical OptiPlex 5060 Builds (Compare 1,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 5060

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback