Axioo SlimBook 14 R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAxioo SlimBook 14 R5  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault CR14Q03
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220315
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 12:16
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 185
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 459
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 15.1
8% 11.4 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDVPM21910256 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 181 43 36 84 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 484
Write 400
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 93.4
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 0.3
71% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 4
44% 101 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Kingston 9905711-060.A00G 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 8.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 6% 70 145 60 60 14" 1296 759 NCP0062
Typical SlimBook 14 R5 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Axioo SlimBook 14 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback