Axioo SlimBook 14 R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAxioo SlimBook 14 R5  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault CR14Q03
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '23 at 08:53
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 34.1
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 121
40% 73 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 348
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDVPM21910256 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 28 175 29 52 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 362
Write 305
Mixed 318
SusWrite 86
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 11.6
58% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 27.2
63% 132 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Kingston 9905711-060.A00G 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 12.1
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 0 14" 1280 720 NCP0062
Typical SlimBook 14 R5 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Axioo SlimBook 14 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback