HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory32.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 10:55
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 92.1
53% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 387
34% 291 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 68.9
55% 71 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 69.7
57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 125 127 128 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.7% Average
Read 189
Write 167
Mixed 110
SusWrite 124
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 21.5
82% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 34
32% 49 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 89%
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
36GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 35 32 25 31 9.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.4% Very poor
Read 153
Write 189
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 32
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 9.97 MB/s
DQ Read 7.9
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 0.2
4% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 81%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
23GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 12 11 8.6 11 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 19.5
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 11.1
10% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
35% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 54%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
317GB free
Firmware: MKAOA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 128 128 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 138
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 126
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70BH1-CH9 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.8% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 28.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7080 LC32G5xT
Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback