PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z420 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1589 |
Memory | 32.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191029 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 16 '23 at 10:55 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | EGY-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 125 127 128 130 MB/s
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
36GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 35 32 25 31 9.6 MB/s
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
23GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 12 11 8.6 11 3.4 MB/s
|
6.41%
Terrible
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
317GB free
Firmware: MKAOA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 128 128 130 130 MB/s
|
74.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70BH1-CH9 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
68.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | SAM7080 LC32G5xT |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,519x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 787x |
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 697x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 498x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 307x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 263x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |