JHZD BQM5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemIntel BQM5
MotherboardJHZD BQM5  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 07:16
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel CoreT i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 69.5
1-Core 191
2-Core 359
107% 207 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1,055
104% 850 Pts
64-Core 1,704
105% 1,704 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A770
Intel(8086 1020) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 83.1
Reflection 134
Parallax 242
68% 153 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 222
134% 159 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 121%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
953GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 112 164 166 166 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 319
Write 256
Mixed 285
SusWrite 144
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 22.7
73% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 67.4
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 86
61% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
814GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 132 164 166 166 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 316
Write 256
Mixed 301
SusWrite 152
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 22.9
74% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 68.3
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 90.5
64% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G52C42S5.M16G1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
MC Read 68.1
MC Write 68.3
MC Mixed 64.9
192% 67.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 46.6
SC Mixed 32
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 170%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical BQM5 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: JHZD BQM5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback