Monster ABRA A5 V16.7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.7  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.7
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211119
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 07:01
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 283
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 761
77% 625 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 5015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1934
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 6.1
4% 7.23 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD Blue SN570 500GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,894
Write 1,879
Mixed 1,608
400% 1,794 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 60.3
204% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 771
594% 818 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FP Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 30
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 18.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1920 1009 NCP004D
Typical ABRA A5 V16.7 Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback