JHZD BQM5

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Intel BQM5
Motherboard	JHZD BQM5 (all builds)
Memory	54.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '23 at 06:22
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
13th Gen Intel CoreT i9-13900H 25 User benchmarks, average bench 96% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 69 1-Core 184 2-Core 348 104% 200 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 898 93% 746 Pts	64-Core 1,611 100% 1,611 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Arc A770 4,203 User benchmarks, average bench 110% Intel(8086 1020) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5074 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.5% Very good	Lighting 79.6 Reflection 118 Parallax 241 65% 146 fps	MRender 256 Gravity 188 Splatting 0.1 105% 148 fps
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 121%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 957GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 98 97 120 140 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 298 Write 257 Mixed 270 SusWrite 127 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 20.3 67% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 66.4 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 63.9 53% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 818GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 123 123 139 142 170 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 302 Write 251 Mixed 267 SusWrite 141 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 22.7 73% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 64.2 DQ Write 79.9 DQ Mixed 80.7 58% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT32G52C42S5.M16G1 2x31.5GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 150% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	162% Outstanding	MC Read 65.2 MC Write 65 MC Mixed 61.5 183% 63.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 45.3 SC Mixed 29.8 91% 31.8 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 173%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	39	4	120	31.5"	1280 720	GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical BQM5 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: JHZD BQM5

CPU
Core i9-12900HIntelBench 99%, 15,403 samples	19x
Gen Intel CoreT i7-1360P13thBench 77%, 40 samples	7x
Gen Intel Core i5-1240P12thBench 79%, 25 samples	6x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	31x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples	16x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	5x

SSD
S660 2TBFanxiangBench 395%, 271 samples	5x
2280 1TBNx-1tbBench 253%, 588 samples	4x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	4x

RAM
CT16G4SFS832A.C8FF 2x16GBCrucialBench 81%, 495 samples	6x
CT32G52C42S5.M16G1 2x31.5GBCrucialBench 150%, 279 samples	5x
2x16GBMicronBench 79%, 439 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16