Lenovo 10FGS03000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10FGS03000  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BC
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 04:57
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 363
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
PowerColor(148C 2416) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 84.3
37% 63.9 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 46.2
Splatting 27.2
43% 56.8 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
690GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52048100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 431
Write 366
Mixed 398
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 34.4
122% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 148
153% 251 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 112%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
69GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 45.9
Mixed 67.2
89% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2
132% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2787 VG27VQ
Typical 10FGS03000 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FGS03000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback