Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory	148.7 GB free of 160 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191120
Uptime	18.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '23 at 01:04
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2 400 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 146 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 608 58% 481 Pts	64-Core 921 57% 921 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 192 Parallax 181 142% 182 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 182 Splatting 125 119% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,445 Write 1,869 Mixed 2,551 511% 2,288 MB/s	4K Read 214 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 20.6 373% 91.9 MB/s	DQ Read 85.5 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 393 246% 265 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB 9,606 User benchmarks, average bench 403% 1.5TB free Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 1681 1482 1372 1481 1382 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,099 Write 1420 Mixed 935 SusWrite 1,419 328% 1,468 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 44 155% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 548 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 483 349% 455 MB/s
Poor: 253% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 515%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 339GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 75 82 117 92 102 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 78 109 87 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 100 Write 92.8 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 84.3 55% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 77 81 117 91 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 91.3 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 89 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 104%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 7.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 115 128 191 146 164 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 93 100 146 116 128 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF Kingston 9965516-071.A0... 160GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.8% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	23"	1280 720	DEL4099 DELL P2314H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 01stBench 60%, 1,235 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 01stBench 59%, 1,097 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	9x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	3x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	4x
980 PRO with Heatsink 2TBSamsungBench 403%, 9,606 samples	4x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x

RAM
HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF Kingston 9965516-071.A0... 160GBHynixBench 57%, 10 samples	9x
M392B1K70CM0-YH9 4x8GBSamsungBench 62%, 26 samples	7x
18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 32GBMicronBench 58%, 3 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $528

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16