Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506HC
Memory	34.9 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220812
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '23 at 23:26
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	ECU-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400H 35,470 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 36.4 1-Core 43 2-Core 78.9 31% 52.8 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 252 24% 199 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 13FC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.35% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.47 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.35% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Target TSP40 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 354% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11273 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2344 2259 2338 2119 2199 2241 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	310% Outstanding	Read 2,707 Write 2,694 Mixed 1,683 SusWrite 2,250 524% 2,333 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 51.6 158% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 392 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 344 254% 338 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 310% Great: 538%
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB 19,397 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 453GB free Firmware: 002C SusWrite @10s intervals: 910 920 902 1006 920 1004 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,193 Write 941 Mixed 879 SusWrite 944 222% 989 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 47.5 119% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 438 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 387 284% 375 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 290%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 39GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 32767 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 22.1 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	15.5"	1280 720	CMN1521

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC Builds (Compare 4,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HC_FX506HC

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	3,745x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	208x
Gen Intel Core i5-11260H11thBench 72%, 2,929 samples	91x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	2,310x
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 38,648 samples	885x
RTX 3050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 56%, 5,186 samples	712x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	1,441x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	1,084x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples	312x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	903x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	663x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 1x8GBMicronBench 42%, 8,707 samples	269x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16