MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 22:17
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 158
2-Core 316
101% 187 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,170
107% 897 Pts
64-Core 2,125
132% 2,125 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 4767) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 236
Parallax 194
184% 219 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 147
Splatting 130
124% 156 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 339 379 79 181 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 464
Mixed 393
SusWrite 223
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 44.9
152% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 253
207% 294 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94%
Great: 115%
SSD 240GB
57GB free
Firmware: SBFM6C.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 184 107 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 455
Write 418
Mixed 336
SusWrite 171
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 38.6
142% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 210
182% 268 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 95%
SSD 240GB
27GB free
Firmware: SBFM6C.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 141 61 55 54 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 204
Write 103
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 136
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 14.9
60% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 22.7
DQ Mixed 21.1
16% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 95%
SSD 240GB
50GB free
Firmware: SBFM6C.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 167 108 107 107 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 285
Write 98.6
Mixed 102
SusWrite 182
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 25.9
88% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 60.4
DQ Write 87.3
DQ Mixed 126
81% 91.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate Portable 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 54
Write 31.8
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 37.4
28% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3600C18-8GVK CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3600C18-8GVK 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 52
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 39.7
124% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 35.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 117%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 0P 4R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 20% 45 133 59 240 26.5" 1920 1080 GSM5B8E LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback