Acer Aspire A317-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A317-51  (all builds)
MotherboardWL Dopey_WC
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 09:56
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 82
1-Core 109
2-Core 26.9
55% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 33.1
8-Core 52.7
5% 42.9 Pts
64-Core 70.5
4% 70.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Acer(1025 135E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.5 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 7.8
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 292 262 213 212 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 649
Write 596
Mixed 596
SusWrite 267
118% 527 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 38.6
127% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 373
288% 399 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 0R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 20% 51 60 7 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Aspire A317-51 Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A317-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback