Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 09:55
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
66% 124 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 363
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 3
Reflection 114
Parallax 2.8
2% 39.9 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 19
Splatting 99.6
39% 39.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM20E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 29 9.9 139 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 561
Write 215
Mixed 49
SusWrite 122
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 5.1
18% 6.07 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 21
35% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 226%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 20 24 24 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 98%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 147 147 147 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 151
Write 131
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 143
171% 128 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 1
404% 7.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 1
438% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2401 24B1W1
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback