Intel X99H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Intel X99
Motherboard	Intel X99H (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '23 at 09:48
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2628 v3 16 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 64 2-Core 145 56% 94.8 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 529 49% 409 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 0.3 2% 1.5 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 1.8 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 7%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BT58SSD08M 128GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2274P Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 463 Write 419 Mixed 362 92% 415 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 12.1 84% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 16.4 61% 129 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 73%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 0GB free Firmware: UF4004RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 147 Write 359 Mixed 97.4 46% 201 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 7.8 32% 8.73 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 55GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 39.1 Write 19.5 Mixed 5.7 22% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 32% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 5GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 0.7 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.7 1% 0.73 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown JAD3200U1808 2x8GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 24 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.5% Above average	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 19.5 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 16.5 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	51	34	60	21.4"	1280 720	LEN66D2 D22e-20

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

CPU
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	337x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	182x
Xeon E5-2650 v4IntelBench 66%, 1,056 samples	99x

GPU
RX 580-2048SPAMDBench 41%, 38,816 samples	99x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $234Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	86x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x
512GB 512GBSSDBench 87%, 6,819 samples	25x

RAM
atermiter 1x16GBUnknownBench 36%, 988 samples	151x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 37%, 604 samples	108x
DDR4 8GB 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 57%, 462 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16